This is certainly supposed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It can be the muse for a lot of pet loads, but I have not been satisfied with the outcomes.
H4831SC Powder available in stock now. Ballistically, this Extreme Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimensions, thus, the designation SC or brief Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to movement with the powder actions extra easily, assisting to ease the continual slicing of granules.
What is actually the difference? Compression. With no Extraordinary/weighty compression affiliated with the extended grain 7828, the strain curve was altered and also the load fell aside.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the tiny I've still left for tumble 2021. I might begin low and perform your way up, determined by what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
The one difference as I comprehend it is that the SC was created to get the job done via powder actions greater (which it does). The for a longer period grains don't feed effectively in any way in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Did you ever consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with normal chamber. Asking yourself what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Anybody loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data you may share? Must also mention I've some ELD-X a hundred seventy five's I wish to examination out, In case you have data on that also.
The SC or SSC h4831 vs h4831sc designated powders normally enable for better load density, so you can normally get a tiny bit more powder within a supplied circumstance when utilizing compressed loads. Use of a drop tube can h4831sc load data even more raise this benefit.
I've located the precise reverse to get accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally exact powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.
Validate YOUR AGE Particular states prohibit promotion or promoting of firearms, ammunition, and connected firearm factors to minors. We’d like making sure that you’re 18 several years of age or older ahead of allowing you to buy our site. Do you think you're 18 decades of age or older?
I've experienced comparable practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot very well with anything at all other than Fed215's. Some components just Never Enjoy well with other. Appears like you have picked out 3 excellent powders, I might expect a minimum of one of these to shoot.
It truly is probably that no further dialogue is required, wherein situation we recommend starting off a fresh thread. If nevertheless you really feel your response is needed you are able to continue to achieve this.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced far better speed and precision with H1000. I would instead utilize a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with small to min costs. I’m speaking 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it absolutely was a minimal 60s grain demand inside a Norma h4831sc load data situation. Not what I used to be on the lookout for, but correct However.